OR WAIT null SECS
At the 2018 Power Gen International conference and exhibition in Orlando, Florida, Vinod Kallianpur, presently with Samsung who has long years of experience on gas turbines at various OEMs, outlined the risks that accompany technologies that have helped to boost gas turbine performance and turbine temperatures. He highlighted the risks associated with technologies that will help to push the envelope in future.
For instance, in the E class at 1050 C, there was a risk of rogue contaminants melting above 1127 C. In the F class that used aero engine ideas in hot section, there was uncertain capability of Secondary Air-cooling System and TBC protection capability to protect materials to safe limits over considerably longer durations than in Aero Engine experience with same technology. There was a general trend to apply more oxidation resistant base metals adapted from aero engines, in comparison to more corrosion resistant selections in older models. But thin airfoil advanced technology compressor carried the risk of faster fouling from fine dust below filtration limit, uncertain compressor degradation rate, control curve uncertainty for managing combustion fuel quality.
In the present 1600 C class machines, additive manufactured combustor burners, R4 turbine blades (longer castings with internal aircooling), and rotating seals are used. General trends are use of CMC hardware, double-wall castings and additive manufactured hardware. Kallianpur says upgrading to more power density entails additional design modifications (mechanical structure) in manifolds and compressor front stages due to greater swirl intensity consequences.
Overall, Kallianpur said advanced GT model introductions generally have three limitations that make it difficult
to project Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and performance realistically: