
Predictive vs. Preventive Maintenance: Finding the Right Balance
Key Takeaways
- Learn how a risk-based maintenance strategy combines time-based and condition-based approaches.
- Discover how one operator's 450-asset study reduced planned maintenance costs by roughly 40 percent.
Wael Al Mandarawi shares the maintenance strategy that helped one operator manage risk across hundreds of critical assets, and the numbers behind it.
Episodes in this series

Sponsored by FS-Elliott
Preventive and predictive maintenance are often framed as competing approaches, but Wael Al Mandarawi argues both are necessary. He describes moving away from a purely time-based maintenance model toward a risk-based strategy that weighs equipment criticality, failure effect, spare parts availability, and restoration time for each asset.
Al Mandarawi details a study run across 450 major pieces of equipment, where some assets were cleared for full extension of inspection intervals and others allowed no extension at all due to hazard risk: a risk-based approach that reduced planned five-year maintenance costs by roughly 40 percent while keeping failure rates controlled. He credits real-time remote monitoring data as one of the key tools that made that shift possible.
Maintenance planners weighing calendar-based schedules against condition-based indicators will find a concrete, field-tested framework in this episode.
Related to this article








